A · Calculus Review
Appendix A

Calculus Review

Much of our work with differential equations asks us to recognize calculus we already know. Checking a proposed solution means differentiating it; finding one often means recognizing a chain rule or a product rule waiting to be undone. This appendix reviews those rules and the functions we most often use them on.

We will move briskly. Rather than collect a long table of derivatives, we will recover the familiar formulas from a few algebraic and geometric facts. The integration techniques will then follow by reversing those derivative calculations. Short questions along the way give you a chance to try the ideas; answers are collected at the end.

A.1Differentiation Rules

The derivative records the first-order change of a function:

𝑓′(𝑥)=limℎ→0𝑓(𝑥+ℎ)−𝑓(𝑥)ℎ.

When this limit exists, a small input change ℎ produces the change 𝑓′(𝑥)ℎ, with an error whose ratio to ℎ tends to zero. This is the local linear approximation behind tangent lines and Euler's method.

The limit definition immediately gives the derivative of a constant as zero and the derivative of 𝑥 as 1. It also gives linearity:

(𝑎𝑓+𝑏𝑔)′=𝑎𝑓′+𝑏𝑔′

for constant scalars 𝑎,𝑏. The derivative of a product requires more care. Both factors change, and we can separate those changes by writing

𝑓(𝑥+ℎ)𝑔(𝑥+ℎ)−𝑓(𝑥)𝑔(𝑥)=(𝑓(𝑥+ℎ)−𝑓(𝑥))𝑔(𝑥+ℎ)+𝑓(𝑥)(𝑔(𝑥+ℎ)−𝑔(𝑥)).

Divide by ℎ and take the limit. Differentiability implies continuity, so 𝑔(𝑥 +ℎ) →𝑔(𝑥), giving the product rule:

(𝑓𝑔)′=𝑓′𝑔+𝑓𝑔′.

Composition combines changes in a different way. An input change first passes through 𝑔, then through 𝑓. Their local scaling factors multiply, giving the chain rule:

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑓(𝑔(𝑥))=𝑓′(𝑔(𝑥))𝑔′(𝑥).

The derivative of 𝑓 is evaluated at the intermediate value 𝑔(𝑥), not at the original input 𝑥.

This also tells us how to differentiate an inverse. Suppose 𝑔 =𝑓−1, so 𝑓(𝑔(𝑥)) =𝑥. Differentiating gives

𝑓′(𝑔(𝑥))𝑔′(𝑥)=1,𝑔′(𝑥)=1𝑓′(𝑔(𝑥)).

The inverse-function theorem justifies the differentiability used here: if 𝑓 is continuously differentiable near 𝑎 and 𝑓′(𝑎) ≠0, then 𝑓 has a differentiable local inverse near 𝑓(𝑎), with

(𝑓−1)′(𝑓(𝑎))=1𝑓′(𝑎).

Geometrically, exchanging input and output exchanges the roles of rise and run. The nonzero derivative matters: the inverse of 𝑥3 has a vertical tangent at zero rather than a finite derivative there.

Try this 1. Differentiate 𝑓(𝑥)𝑓(𝑥)𝑔(𝑥) using only the product rule, and then differentiate 𝑓(𝑔(𝑥))𝑔(𝑥).

Try this 2. A continuously differentiable, invertible function satisfies 𝑓(1) =2 and 𝑓′(1) =4. What is (𝑓−1)′(2)? Why does the formula ask for 𝑓′(1) rather than 𝑓′(2)?

A.2Elementary Functions

A.2.1Powers, reciprocals, and roots

The product rule produces every positive-integer power derivative. The case 𝑛 =1 is already known. If (𝑥𝑛)′ =𝑛𝑥𝑛−1, then

(𝑥𝑛+1)′=(𝑥𝑛𝑥)′=𝑛𝑥𝑛−1𝑥+𝑥𝑛=(𝑛+1)𝑥𝑛.

Induction therefore proves the rule for all positive integers 𝑛. Linearity now differentiates any polynomial.

We can find other derivatives by differentiating identities. Let 𝑟(𝑥) =1/𝑥 for 𝑥 ≠0. Since 𝑥𝑟(𝑥) =1, the product rule gives

𝑟(𝑥)+𝑥𝑟′(𝑥)=0,𝑟′(𝑥)=−1𝑥2.

The chain rule consequently gives (1/𝑔)′ = −𝑔′/𝑔2 wherever 𝑔 ≠0. Applying the product rule to 𝑓/𝑔 =𝑓(1/𝑔) yields the quotient rule:

(𝑓𝑔)′=𝑓′𝑔−𝑓𝑔′𝑔2.

For the square root, set 𝑠(𝑥) =√𝑥 on 𝑥 >0. It is the inverse of squaring on the positive half-line, so the inverse rule ensures it is differentiable. Differentiate 𝑠(𝑥)𝑠(𝑥) =𝑥:

2𝑠(𝑥)𝑠′(𝑥)=1,𝑠′(𝑥)=12√𝑥.

These identities give formulas on their stated domains. Neither dividing by 𝑥 at zero nor dividing by √𝑥 at zero is allowed. With the chain rule, however, we immediately obtain such calculations as

𝑑𝑑𝑡√𝑡2+4=2𝑡2√𝑡2+4=𝑡√𝑡2+4,

which is valid for every real 𝑡.

A.2.2Sine and cosine

The derivative formulas for sine and cosine come from the geometry of a small angle. Measure angles in radians. For 0 <ℎ <𝜋/2, draw the unit circle with center 𝑂, the point 𝐴 =(1,0), and 𝑃 =(cos⁡ℎ,sin⁡ℎ). Extend the ray 𝑂𝑃 to meet the tangent line 𝑥 =1 at 𝑇 =(1,tan⁡ℎ).

The triangle 𝑂𝐴𝑃 lies inside the circular sector 𝑂𝐴𝑃, which lies inside the triangle 𝑂𝐴𝑇. Comparing their areas gives

12sin⁡ℎ<12ℎ<12tan⁡ℎ.

The sector has area ℎ/2 because its angle is the fraction ℎ/(2𝜋) of a full circle of area 𝜋. This is where radian measure enters.

Figure A.1 The inscribed triangle lies inside the sector, and the sector inside the tangent triangle. Their common base 𝑂𝐴 has length one; the triangle heights are sin⁡ℎ and tan⁡ℎ. Vary the angle to compare the three areas as ℎ decreases. The area inequalities, rather than the appearance of the picture, establish the limit.

Rearranging the inequalities gives

cos⁡ℎ<sin⁡ℎℎ<1.

As ℎ →0+, the point 𝑃 approaches 𝐴, so cos⁡ℎ →1. The squeeze theorem gives the limit 1; because sin⁡ℎ/ℎ is even, the same limit holds from the left. Using the circle identity sin2⁡ℎ +cos2⁡ℎ =1 then gives

cos⁡ℎ−1ℎ=−sin⁡ℎℎsin⁡ℎ1+cos⁡ℎ⟶0.

Now the angle-addition identity supplies the derivative:

sin⁡(𝑥+ℎ)−sin⁡𝑥ℎ=sin⁡𝑥cos⁡ℎ−1ℎ+cos⁡𝑥sin⁡ℎℎ⟶cos⁡𝑥.

The cosine addition identity similarly gives −sin⁡𝑥. Thus

(sin⁡𝑥)′=cos⁡𝑥,(cos⁡𝑥)′=−sin⁡𝑥.

The quotient rule gives (tan⁡𝑥)′ =1/cos2⁡𝑥 wherever cos⁡𝑥 ≠0. On ( −𝜋/2,𝜋/2), tangent has the inverse arctan, so the inverse derivative rule gives

(arctan⁡𝑥)′=cos2⁡(arctan⁡𝑥)=11+𝑥2.

Here the last equality uses 1 +tan2⁡𝜃 =1/cos2⁡𝜃.

A.2.3Exponentials and logarithms

Begin with a familiar exponential 𝑎𝑥, where 𝑎 >0. We take the ordinary exponent laws and differentiability of these functions as known from calculus. The addition law separates the difference quotient:

𝑎𝑥+ℎ−𝑎𝑥ℎ=𝑎𝑥𝑎ℎ−1ℎ.

Since 𝑎0 =1, the limit of the last factor is exactly the slope of 𝑎𝑥 at zero. So the derivative of an exponential is the exponential itself, multiplied by its slope at zero.

Which base makes that extra factor equal to 1? That base is 𝑒: the number 𝑒 ≈2.71828 is characterized by

limℎ→0𝑒ℎ−1ℎ=1.

We take the existence of this base as known from calculus. The difference-quotient calculation above now gives

𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑒𝑥=𝑒𝑥.

The natural exponential 𝑒𝑥 has both value 1 and slope 1 at zero, and its derivative equals its value everywhere.

The natural logarithm, written log⁡𝑥 or ln⁡𝑥, is the inverse of this exponential. Its domain is 𝑥 >0, and

𝑒log⁡𝑥=𝑥,log⁡(𝑒𝑡)=𝑡.

The inverse rule now does the work:

(log⁡𝑥)′=1𝑒log⁡𝑥=1𝑥.

The exponential addition law also gives log⁡(𝑎𝑏) =log⁡𝑎 +log⁡𝑏 for positive 𝑎,𝑏. For another positive base 𝑎, write 𝑎 =𝑒log⁡𝑎 and use the chain rule:

𝑎𝑥=𝑒𝑥log⁡𝑎,𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑎𝑥=(log⁡𝑎)𝑎𝑥.

Likewise, for a real exponent 𝛼 and 𝑥 >0,

𝑥𝛼=𝑒𝛼log⁡𝑥,𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥𝛼=𝑒𝛼log⁡𝑥𝛼𝑥=𝛼𝑥𝛼−1.

This extends the power rule beyond the integer case proved earlier. For integer powers we also have the larger domains already allowed by their algebraic definitions.

One form of the logarithm derivative is particularly useful when integrating. For 𝑥 <0, the chain rule gives (log⁡( −𝑥))′ =( −1)/( −𝑥) =1/𝑥. Together with the positive case, this says

𝑑𝑑𝑥log⁡|𝑥|=1𝑥(𝑥≠0),𝑑𝑑𝑡log⁡|𝑔(𝑡)|=𝑔′(𝑡)𝑔(𝑡)(𝑔(𝑡)≠0).

Try this 3. Differentiate 𝑒−𝑡sin⁡(2𝑡) and (log⁡𝑡)/𝑡, stating where each formula is valid.

Try this 4. Differentiate log⁡|1 −𝑡2|. On which intervals is this function differentiable? Does a negative value of 1 −𝑡2 prevent us from using the formula?

A.3Integration and the Fundamental Theorem

An integral adds up a rate over an interval. For continuous 𝑓, the definite integral ∫𝑏𝑎𝑓(𝑠) 𝑑𝑠 is the limit of sums of values of 𝑓 times small interval widths. Contributions below zero carry a negative sign. Reversing the bounds reverses the sign, and an interval of zero length gives zero.

Fix 𝑎 and let the other endpoint vary:

𝐹𝑎(𝑡)=∫𝑡𝑎𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠.

We have defined a function of 𝑡. The letter 𝑠 is a dummy variable which runs through the integral; renaming it does not change the answer. The subscript on 𝐹𝑎 records the base point, which stays fixed.

Theorem A.1 (Fundamental Theorem of Calculus). Let 𝑓 be continuous on an interval 𝐼 and let 𝑎 ∈𝐼. Then 𝐹𝑎(𝑡) =∫𝑡𝑎𝑓(𝑠) 𝑑𝑠 satisfies 𝐹′𝑎(𝑡) =𝑓(𝑡) at interior points of 𝐼. If 𝐺′ =𝑓 on 𝐼, then for 𝑎,𝑏 ∈𝐼,

∫𝑏𝑎𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠=𝐺(𝑏)−𝐺(𝑎).

The first statement comes from

𝐹𝑎(𝑡+ℎ)−𝐹𝑎(𝑡)ℎ=1ℎ∫𝑡+ℎ𝑡𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠.

This is the average value of 𝑓 over a shrinking interval, so continuity makes its limit 𝑓(𝑡). For the second statement, 𝐺 −𝐹𝑎 has derivative zero and hence is constant by the mean value theorem. Evaluating that constant at 𝑎 gives 𝐺(𝑡) −𝐹𝑎(𝑡) =𝐺(𝑎).

A.3.1Which integral are we writing?

An antiderivative of 𝑓 is a function 𝐺 with 𝐺′ =𝑓. Any two antiderivatives differ by a constant on an interval, since their difference has derivative zero. The indefinite integral notation records the whole family:

∫𝑓(𝑡)𝑑𝑡=𝐺(𝑡)+𝐶.

There are no bounds because no value or base point has yet been selected. By contrast, a definite integral with fixed bounds gives a number, while a variable bound gives a particular function. For the same integrand,

∫2𝑡𝑑𝑡=𝑡2+𝐶,∫202𝑠𝑑𝑠=4,∫𝑡02𝑠𝑑𝑠=𝑡2.

The last expression selects the antiderivative which is zero at 𝑡 =0. There is no missing +𝐶 in a definite integral: its bounds have already fixed its value. To describe every antiderivative, we add a constant outside the definite integral:

𝑦(𝑡)=𝐶+∫𝑡0𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠.

This will be our default form when zero belongs to the interval under consideration. In this form 𝐶 =𝑦(0). There is nothing mandatory about zero, however. We can choose any base point 𝑎 in the interval and write

𝑦(𝑡)=𝐶+∫𝑡𝑎𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠,𝐶=𝑦(𝑎).

Changing the base point changes the constant needed to describe the same function. An initial condition 𝑦(𝑡0) =𝑦0 suggests an especially convenient choice:

𝑦(𝑡)=𝑦0+∫𝑡𝑡0𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠.

If we keep another base point 𝑎, then 𝐶 =𝑦0 −∫𝑡0𝑎𝑓(𝑠) 𝑑𝑠. If instead we start from an arbitrary antiderivative 𝐺, the formula 𝑦 =𝐺 +𝐶 requires 𝐶 =𝑦0 −𝐺(𝑡0). The symbol 𝐶 does not have a fixed numerical meaning independent of how we write the antiderivative.

For example, the problem 𝑦′ =2𝑡, 𝑦(1) =3 from Chapter 2 can be written in all three ways:

𝑦(𝑡)=𝑡2+2=2+∫𝑡02𝑠𝑑𝑠=3+∫𝑡12𝑠𝑑𝑠.

The constants 2 and 3 differ because the integrals have different base points. Both expressions describe the same function.

An integral also defines an explicit function when no elementary antiderivative is available. For instance,

𝐻(𝑡)=∫𝑡0𝑒−𝑠2𝑑𝑠

is a particular function with 𝐻(0) =0 and 𝐻′(𝑡) =𝑒−𝑡2. The integral specifies its value at every 𝑡; an elementary formula is not required. Numerical integration approximates those values, while the Fundamental Theorem gives its derivative exactly.

A.3.2Logarithms and variable endpoints

We defined the logarithm as an inverse function and proved that its derivative is 1/𝑥. The Fundamental Theorem now identifies its integral representation:

∫𝑥1𝑑𝑢𝑢=log⁡𝑥−log⁡1=log⁡𝑥,𝑥>0.

Thus the inverse of the exponential also measures accumulated area under 1/𝑥. Notice the base point 1. We could not replace it by zero here: the integrand is undefined there and the integral diverges. Base points must respect the interval on which the calculation makes sense.

Finally, combine the Fundamental Theorem with the chain rule. If 𝑢(𝑡) and 𝑣(𝑡) are differentiable and their values lie in the interval of continuity of 𝑓, then

𝑑𝑑𝑡∫𝑣(𝑡)𝑢(𝑡)𝑓(𝑠)𝑑𝑠=𝑓(𝑣(𝑡))𝑣′(𝑡)−𝑓(𝑢(𝑡))𝑢′(𝑡).

One way to see both terms is to write the integral as 𝐹𝑎(𝑣(𝑡)) −𝐹𝑎(𝑢(𝑡)). No antiderivative formula for 𝑓 is needed.

Try this 5. Solve 𝑦′ =cos⁡𝑡, 𝑦(𝜋/2) =3. Write the answer as an elementary antiderivative plus a constant, as a constant plus an integral from 0 to 𝑡, and as an integral based at the initial time.

Try this 6. Differentiate ∫𝑡2𝑡𝑒−𝑠2 𝑑𝑠 without evaluating the integral.

A.4Substitution and Integration by Parts

The chain rule says that if 𝐹′ =𝑓, then (𝐹(𝑔(𝑡)))′ =𝑓(𝑔(𝑡))𝑔′(𝑡). Read backward, it gives

∫𝑓(𝑔(𝑡))𝑔′(𝑡)𝑑𝑡=𝐹(𝑔(𝑡))+𝐶.

The substitution notation 𝑢 =𝑔(𝑡), 𝑑𝑢 =𝑔′(𝑡) 𝑑𝑡 records this same calculation. Its purpose is to recognize an outer function together with the derivative of its input. For example,

∫2𝑡1+𝑡2𝑑𝑡=∫𝑑𝑢𝑢=log⁡𝑢+𝐶=log⁡(1+𝑡2)+𝐶,𝑢=1+𝑡2.

We do not need an absolute value in the final expression because 1 +𝑡2 >0. A substitution in a definite integral also changes its bounds:

∫𝑏𝑎𝑓(𝑔(𝑡))𝑔′(𝑡)𝑑𝑡=∫𝑔(𝑏)𝑔(𝑎)𝑓(𝑢)𝑑𝑢.

For this form of substitution, 𝑓 continuous and 𝑔 continuously differentiable suffice; 𝑔 need not be one-to-one. The identity follows by evaluating 𝐹(𝑔(𝑏)) −𝐹(𝑔(𝑎)) on both sides. Reversals in direction are already accounted for by the signed derivative and bounds.

For a product, (𝑢𝑣)′ =𝑢′𝑣 +𝑢𝑣′. Integrating and rearranging gives integration by parts:

∫𝑢(𝑡)𝑣′(𝑡)𝑑𝑡=𝑢(𝑡)𝑣(𝑡)−∫𝑢′(𝑡)𝑣(𝑡)𝑑𝑡.

Indefinite integrals here represent antiderivative families; one arbitrary constant in the final answer accounts for the freedom on both sides. With fixed bounds the precise evaluation is

∫𝑏𝑎𝑢𝑣′𝑑𝑡=𝑢(𝑏)𝑣(𝑏)−𝑢(𝑎)𝑣(𝑎)−∫𝑏𝑎𝑢′𝑣𝑑𝑡.

The useful choice is one for which differentiating 𝑢 simplifies it, while integrating 𝑣′ is possible. For ∫𝑡𝑒𝑡 𝑑𝑡, choose 𝑢 =𝑡 and 𝑣′ =𝑒𝑡. Then

∫𝑡𝑒𝑡𝑑𝑡=𝑡𝑒𝑡−∫𝑒𝑡𝑑𝑡=(𝑡−1)𝑒𝑡+𝐶.

Sometimes both techniques are needed in one calculation. Assignment 2 led to

∫2𝑡3𝑒𝑡2𝑑𝑡.

The exponential suggests 𝑢 =𝑡2, but we must transform the entire integrand: 2𝑡3 𝑑𝑡 =𝑡2(2𝑡 𝑑𝑡) =𝑢 𝑑𝑢. Thus

∫2𝑡3𝑒𝑡2𝑑𝑡=∫𝑢𝑒𝑢𝑑𝑢=(𝑢−1)𝑒𝑢+𝐶=(𝑡2−1)𝑒𝑡2+𝐶.

The substitution exposes the product which integration by parts can simplify. Differentiating the final answer checks both steps at once.

Try this 7. Use integration by parts to find ∫𝑡log⁡𝑡 𝑑𝑡 on 𝑡 >0.

Try this 8. Evaluate ∫10𝑡/(1 +𝑡2) 𝑑𝑡 by substitution, changing the bounds when you change variables.

A.5Partial Fractions

Sometimes the calculus becomes easy after an algebraic rearrangement. For the logistic equation in Chapter 4 we needed to integrate

1𝑥(1−𝑥/𝐾),𝐾>0.

Its denominator has two distinct linear factors. Try expressing it as a sum with one factor in each denominator:

1𝑥(1−𝑥/𝐾)=𝐴𝑥+𝐵𝐾−𝑥.

Multiplying by 𝑥(𝐾 −𝑥) turns the rational identity into a polynomial identity:

𝐾=𝐴(𝐾−𝑥)+𝐵𝑥=𝐴𝐾+(𝐵−𝐴)𝑥.

Matching the constant and linear coefficients gives 𝐴 =𝐵 =1. We have therefore reduced the integral to

∫𝑑𝑥𝑥(1−𝑥/𝐾)=log⁡|𝑥|−log⁡|𝐾−𝑥|+𝐶.

The minus sign in the second logarithm comes from the derivative of 𝐾 −𝑥. Differentiation verifies the decomposition and its integral. The answer applies on each interval avoiding 0 and 𝐾; constants on different intervals need not agree.

The general method follows the factorization of the denominator. First use polynomial division if the numerator's degree is at least the denominator's. For the remaining proper fraction, each linear factor 𝑥 −𝑎 contributes a term 𝐴/(𝑥 −𝑎). A repeated factor (𝑥 −𝑎)𝑚 requires all powers through 𝑚:

𝐴1𝑥−𝑎+𝐴2(𝑥−𝑎)2+⋯+𝐴𝑚(𝑥−𝑎)𝑚.

A quadratic factor 𝑞(𝑥) with no real root requires a linear numerator (𝐵𝑥 +𝐶)/𝑞(𝑥); if it is repeated, include such a numerator over each power of 𝑞. Multiply by the common denominator and match coefficients to find the unknown constants.

Linear-factor terms integrate using powers and logarithms. For a single irreducible quadratic, split its numerator into a multiple of 𝑞′ and a constant. The first part integrates to a logarithm; completing the square in the remaining part leads to arctangent. The basic identity is

∫𝑑𝑥(𝑥−𝑏)2+𝑎2=1𝑎arctan⁡𝑥−𝑏𝑎+𝐶,𝑎>0,

which follows by substitution and the arctangent derivative. More elaborate repeated-quadratic integrals need further reductions; the linear factors and single quadratics cover the calculations we need here.

Partial fractions does not introduce a new differentiation rule. It rewrites a rational function until the derivatives we already understand become visible.

Try this 9. Decompose and integrate 1/[𝑥(𝑥 +1)]. State the intervals on which your antiderivative formulas apply.

Try this 10. Find an antiderivative of (2𝑥 +3)/(𝑥2 +2𝑥 +5) by separating a derivative-of-the-denominator term and then completing the square.

Answers to the Review Questions

1. The derivatives are 2𝑓𝑓′𝑔 +𝑓2𝑔′ and 𝑓′(𝑔(𝑥))𝑔′(𝑥)𝑔(𝑥) +𝑓(𝑔(𝑥))𝑔′(𝑥).

2. (𝑓−1)′(2) =1/4. The inverse takes input 2 back to 1, so we use the derivative of 𝑓 at that recovered input.

3. The first derivative is 𝑒−𝑡(2cos⁡(2𝑡) −sin⁡(2𝑡)), valid for every real 𝑡. The second is (1 −log⁡𝑡)/𝑡2, valid on 𝑡 >0.

4. The derivative is −2𝑡/(1 −𝑡2) on ( −∞, −1), ( −1,1), and (1,∞). The absolute value allows negative values of 1 −𝑡2; only its zeros are excluded.

5. All three expressions are

𝑦(𝑡)=sin⁡𝑡+2=2+∫𝑡0cos⁡𝑠𝑑𝑠=3+∫𝑡𝜋/2cos⁡𝑠𝑑𝑠.

6. The derivative is 2𝑡𝑒−𝑡4 −𝑒−𝑡2. Both endpoint derivatives are needed.

7. Choose 𝑢 =log⁡𝑡 and 𝑣′ =𝑡, so 𝑢′ =1/𝑡 and 𝑣 =𝑡2/2. Then

∫𝑡log⁡𝑡𝑑𝑡=𝑡22log⁡𝑡−∫𝑡2𝑑𝑡=𝑡22log⁡𝑡−𝑡24+𝐶.

8. Set 𝑢 =1 +𝑡2, so 𝑑𝑢 =2𝑡 𝑑𝑡. The new bounds are 1 and 2, giving 12∫21𝑑𝑢/𝑢 =12log⁡2.

9. 1/[𝑥(𝑥 +1)] =1/𝑥 −1/(𝑥 +1), so an antiderivative is log⁡|𝑥| −log⁡|𝑥 +1| +𝐶. The intervals are ( −∞, −1), ( −1,0), and (0,∞).

10. The numerator is (2𝑥 +2) +1 and the denominator is (𝑥 +1)2 +4. Thus an antiderivative, valid on all of ℝ, is

log⁡(𝑥2+2𝑥+5)+12arctan⁡𝑥+12+𝐶.

Further Reading

OpenStax's freely available Calculus gives additional worked practice: Volume 1, Chapter 3 reviews differentiation, and Volume 1, Chapter 5 develops integration and the Fundamental Theorem. Volume 2, Chapter 3 extends the integration techniques, including integration by parts and partial fractions.